LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4.1 Flash model pageQwen3.8 Flash Next model page
Rank #14 vs #17AskClash overall scores 68.3 vs 67.0.
Pricing $0.15/$0.60 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
API vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs Alibaba.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall Score68.367.0
Leaderboard Rank#14#17
ACB63.066.5
HLE36.835.9
GPQA90.991.7
IFEval—81.3
SWE-Pro—62.5
Terminal-Bench90.686.1
DeepSWE74.258.7
GDPval-AA1600.01743.0
Finance Agent53.5—
CharXiv—90.6
MMMU-Pro77.079.8
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.16
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.60$0.47
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1112

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 4 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 4 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
68.3DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
67.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
ACB
63.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
HLE
36.8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GPQA
90.9DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Terminal-Bench
90.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
86.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE
74.2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GDPval-AA
1600.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
MMMU-Pro
77.0DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
79.8Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.