How do DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max): benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 or DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)?

AskClash compares DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 model page DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) model page

Rank #16 vs #29AskClash overall scores 56.1 vs 41.5.

Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $0.43/$0.87Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs DeepSeek.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731	DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Overall Score	56.1	41.5
Leaderboard Rank	#16	#29
RWT	—	7.0
HLE	37.0	37.7
GPQA	91.0	90.1
MATH-500	57.4	64.5
SWE-bench	79.0	80.6
SWE-Pro	—	55.4
Terminal-Bench	82.7	67.9
DeepSWE	54.4	—
MCP Atlas	69.0	73.6
Tau2	—	96.2
MRCR	78.7	83.5
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.14	$0.43
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.28	$0.87
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	9

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads 3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Overall

56.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

41.5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

HLE

37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

37.7DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

GPQA

91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

90.1DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

MATH-500

57.4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

64.5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

SWE-bench

79.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

80.6DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Terminal-Bench

82.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

67.9DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

MCP Atlas

69.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

73.6DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

MRCR

78.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

83.5DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

Input$0.43

Output$0.87

Workload$0.61

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.