LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #16 vs #18AskClash overall scores 56.1 vs 53.3.
Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs Moonshot AI.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Kimi K2.7
Overall Score56.153.3
Leaderboard Rank#16#18
RWT—7.5
HLE37.054.0
GPQA91.090.5
MATH-50057.4—
SWE-bench79.080.2
SWE-Pro—58.6
Terminal-Bench82.766.7
DeepSWE54.430.5
OSWorld—73.1
MCP Atlas69.076.0
Finance Agent—44.9
CharXiv—80.4
MMMU-Pro—79.4
Tau2—90.1
MRCR78.7—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.14$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.28$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published914

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads 4 and Kimi K2.7 leads 3 of 7 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Kimi K2.7
Overall
56.1DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
53.3Kimi K2.7
HLE
37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
90.5Kimi K2.7
SWE-bench
79.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
80.2Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
82.7DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
66.7Kimi K2.7
DeepSWE
54.4DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
30.5Kimi K2.7
MCP Atlas
69.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
76.0Kimi K2.7
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Kimi K3 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.