Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #23 vs #25AskClash overall scores 47.0 vs 46.0.
Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $0.45/$3.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs Alibaba.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 | Qwen3.8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 47.0 | 46.0 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #23 | #25 |
| ACB | 48.0 | 56.4 |
| HLE | 37.0 | 30.8 |
| GPQA | 91.0 | 89.2 |
| IFEval | — | 79.5 |
| SWE-bench | 79.0 | — |
| SWE-Pro | — | 61.7 |
| Terminal-Bench | 82.7 | 73.0 |
| DeepSWE | 54.4 | 42.2 |
| OSWorld | — | 84.3 |
| MCP Atlas | 69.0 | — |
| Finance Agent | 49.5 | 48.6 |
| CharXiv | — | 90.2 |
| MRCR | 78.7 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.14 | $0.45 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.28 | $3.20 |
| Context Window | 1M | 262K |
| Benchmarks Published | 10 | 11 |
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.8 27B head-to-head charts
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads 6 and Qwen3.8 27B leads 1 of 7 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Qwen3.8 27B
Overall
ACB
HLE
GPQA
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
Finance Agent
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Qwen3.8 27B
Input$0.45
Output$3.20
Workload$1.09
Context262K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B comparisons
Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Qwen3.8 27B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BGLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 27BGrok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 27BGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.