How do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

AskClash compares DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page

Rank #19 vs #72AskClash overall scores 58.2 vs 12.0.

Pricing $0.14/$0.28 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

API vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Google.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score	58.2	12.0
Leaderboard Rank	#19	#72
ACB	58.6	—
RWT	—	7.0
HLE	37.0	—
GPQA	91.0	—
SWE-bench	79.0	—
SWE-Pro	—	54.2
Terminal-Bench	83.9	54.0
DeepSWE	59.3	—
OSWorld	—	74.0
MCP Atlas	69.0	—
Finance Agent	49.5	47.4
MRCR	78.7	72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.14	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.28	$2.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	7

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 0 of 4 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Overall

58.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

12.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Terminal-Bench

83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

54.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Finance Agent

49.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

47.4Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

MRCR

78.7DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

72.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Input$0.30

Output$2.50

Workload$0.80

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.