LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) model pageKimi K2.7 model page
Rank #25 vs #30AskClash overall scores 51.9 vs 49.0.
Pricing $0.43/$0.87 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightDeepSeek vs Moonshot AI.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Kimi K2.7
Overall Score51.949.0
Leaderboard Rank#25#30
RWT7.07.5
HLE37.754.0
GPQA90.190.5
MATH-50064.5—
SWE-bench80.680.2
SWE-Pro55.458.6
Terminal-Bench67.966.7
DeepSWE—30.5
OSWorld—73.1
MCP Atlas73.676.0
Finance Agent—44.9
CharXiv—80.4
MMMU-Pro—79.4
Tau296.290.1
MRCR83.5—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.43$0.95
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.87$4.00
Context Window1M256K
Benchmarks Published914

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) leads 4 and Kimi K2.7 leads 5 of 9 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Kimi K2.7
Overall
51.9DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
49.0Kimi K2.7
RWT
7.0DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
7.5Kimi K2.7
HLE
37.7DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
54.0Kimi K2.7
GPQA
90.1DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
90.5Kimi K2.7
SWE-bench
80.6DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
80.2Kimi K2.7
SWE-Pro
55.4DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
58.6Kimi K2.7
Terminal-Bench
67.9DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
66.7Kimi K2.7
MCP Atlas
73.6DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
76.0Kimi K2.7
Tau2
96.2DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
90.1Kimi K2.7
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Input$0.43
Output$0.87
Workload$0.61
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Kimi K2.7 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.7

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.