LLM Comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs SWE-1.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side DeepSeek V4 Pro vs SWE-1.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #23 vs #44AskClash overall scores 54.7 vs 28.8.
Pricing $1.74/$3.48 vs $0/$0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryDeepSeek vs Cognition.

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs SWE-1.7 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricDeepSeek V4 ProSWE-1.7
Overall Score54.728.8
Leaderboard Rank#23#44
RWT7.09.0
HLE37.7
GPQA90.1
MATH-50064.5
SWE-bench80.6
SWE-Pro55.4
Terminal-Bench67.981.5
LiveCodeBench93.5
MCP Atlas73.6
Tau296.2
MRCR83.5
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.74$0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$3.48$0
Context Window1M256K
Benchmark Cells101

More DeepSeek V4 Pro and SWE-1.7 comparisons

Explore how DeepSeek V4 Pro and SWE-1.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.