How do Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Composer 2.5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Composer 2.5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Composer 2.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite or Composer 2.5?

AskClash compares Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Composer 2.5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Composer 2.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page Composer 2.5 model page

Rank #60 vs #65AskClash overall scores 39.8 vs 37.0.

Pricing $0.30/$2.50 vs $0.50/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Cursor.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Composer 2.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite	Composer 2.5
Overall Score	39.8	37.0
Leaderboard Rank	#60	#65
ACB	—	53.2
RWT	7.0	8.5
Coding Agent Index	—	38.3
HLE	18.8	—
GPQA	83.8	—
SWE-Pro	54.2	47.0
SWE-Atlas	—	31.2
Terminal-Bench	54.0	67.8
GDPval-AA	1140.0	—
OSWorld	74.0	—
Finance Agent	47.4	—
MMMU-Pro	79.0	—
MRCR	72.2	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.30	$0.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.50	$2.50
Context Window	1M	200K
Benchmarks Published	10	5

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Composer 2.5 head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 2 and Composer 2.5 leads 2 of 4 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteComposer 2.5

Overall

39.8Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

37.0Composer 2.5

RWT

7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

8.5Composer 2.5

SWE-Pro

54.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

47.0Composer 2.5

Terminal-Bench

54.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

67.8Composer 2.5

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Input$0.30

Output$2.50

Workload$0.80

Context1M

Composer 2.5

Input$0.50

Output$2.50

Workload$1.00

Context200K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Composer 2.5 comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Composer 2.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Fable 5.1 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5 Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Opus 5 vs Composer 2.5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GPT-5.6 Sol vs Composer 2.5 GPT-6 Astra vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GPT-6 Astra vs Composer 2.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.