LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #17 vs #53AskClash overall scores 62.9 vs 19.9.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $1.74/$3.48Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs DeepSeek.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek V4 Pro
Overall Score62.919.9
Leaderboard Rank#17#53
RWT7.0
HLE38.07.7
GPQA92.872.9
MATH-50064.5
SWE-bench73.6
SWE-Pro58.752.1
Terminal-Bench78.059.1
DeepSWE49.0
OSWorld83.0
MCP Atlas69.4
Finance Agent44.1
CharXiv85.2
MMMU-Pro83.2
MRCR91.844.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$1.74
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$3.48
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published118

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 6 and DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 0 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek V4 Pro
Overall
62.9Gemini 3.6 Flash
19.9DeepSeek V4 Pro
HLE
38.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
7.7DeepSeek V4 Pro
GPQA
92.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
72.9DeepSeek V4 Pro
SWE-Pro
58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
52.1DeepSeek V4 Pro
Terminal-Bench
78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
59.1DeepSeek V4 Pro
MRCR
91.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
44.7DeepSeek V4 Pro
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input$1.74
Output$3.48
Workload$2.44
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.6 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.6 Flash and DeepSeek V4 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.