LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageGemini 3.6 Flash model page
Rank #1 vs #17AskClash overall scores 92.0 vs 62.9.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Google.

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.6 Flash
Overall Score92.062.9
Leaderboard Rank#1#17
RWT9.0—
Coding Agent Index77.2—
HLE64.538.0
GPQA94.592.8
IFEval80.3—
SWE-bench95.5—
SWE-Pro80.358.7
SWE-Atlas83.3—
Terminal-Bench88.078.0
DeepSWE69.749.0
OSWorld85.083.0
Finance Agent56.3—
CharXiv93.585.2
MMMU-Pro92.783.2
Tau289.2—
MRCR—91.8
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$7.50
Context Window1M+1M
Benchmarks Published1611

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 9 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 0 of 9 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5Gemini 3.6 Flash
Overall
92.0Claude Fable 5
62.9Gemini 3.6 Flash
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
38.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
92.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
SWE-Pro
80.3Claude Fable 5
58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSWE
69.7Claude Fable 5
49.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
OSWorld
85.0Claude Fable 5
83.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
CharXiv
93.5Claude Fable 5
85.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
MMMU-Pro
92.7Claude Fable 5
83.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K3Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.6 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.