How do Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Gemini 3.6 Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

AskClash compares Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Gemini 3.6 Flash model page Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page

Rank #17 vs #61AskClash overall scores 62.9 vs 14.2.

Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryGoogle vs Google.

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Gemini 3.6 Flash	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score	62.9	14.2
Leaderboard Rank	#17	#61
RWT	—	7.0
HLE	38.0	—
GPQA	92.8	—
SWE-Pro	58.7	54.2
Terminal-Bench	78.0	54.0
DeepSWE	49.0	—
OSWorld	83.0	74.0
CharXiv	85.2	—
MMMU-Pro	83.2	—
MRCR	91.8	72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.50	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$7.50	$2.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	6

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.6 FlashGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Overall

62.9Gemini 3.6 Flash

14.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

SWE-Pro

58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash

54.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Terminal-Bench

78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash

54.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

OSWorld

83.0Gemini 3.6 Flash

74.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

MRCR

91.8Gemini 3.6 Flash

72.2Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Input$1.50

Output$7.50

Workload$3.00

Context1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Input$0.30

Output$2.50

Workload$0.80

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.6 Flash GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Kimi K3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash Grok 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.