LLM Comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher (#14 vs #26); Qwen3.8 Flash Next costs less ($0.16/$0.47 vs $1.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboardGemini 3.8 Flash model pageQwen3.8 Flash Next model page
Rank #14 vs #26AskClash overall scores 62.6 vs 57.3.
Pricing $1.50/$7.50 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightGoogle vs Alibaba.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall Score62.657.3
Leaderboard Rank#14#26
ACB64.266.5
HLE54.935.9
GPQA95.391.7
IFEval—81.3
SWE-Pro—62.5
Terminal-Bench19.725.2
DeepSWE73.858.7
GDPval-AA1545.01743.0
Finance Agent61.4—
CharXiv86.290.6
MMMU-Pro85.679.8
ARC-AGI 289.2—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$0.16
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$0.47
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1312

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 5 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 4 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Gemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
62.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
57.3Qwen3.8 Flash Next
ACB
64.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
HLE
54.9Gemini 3.8 Flash
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GPQA
95.3Gemini 3.8 Flash
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Terminal-Bench
19.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
25.2Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE
73.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GDPval-AA
1545.0Gemini 3.8 Flash
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
CharXiv
86.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
MMMU-Pro
85.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
79.8Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons

Explore how Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.