How do GLM-5.2 and Hy3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GLM-5.2 and Hy3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GLM-5.2 vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: GLM-5.2 or Hy3?

AskClash compares GLM-5.2 and Hy3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side GLM-5.2 vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GLM-5.2 model page Hy3 model page

Rank #11 vs #18AskClash overall scores 70.8 vs 58.7.

Pricing $1.40/$4.40 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightZ.AI vs Tencent.

GLM-5.2 vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GLM-5.2	Hy3
Overall Score	70.8	58.7
Leaderboard Rank	#11	#18
RWT	8.5	8.0
Coding Agent Index	74.4	—
HLE	54.7	53.2
GPQA	91.2	90.4
IFEval	73.3	—
SWE-bench	—	78.0
SWE-Pro	62.1	57.9
SWE-Atlas	74.4	—
Terminal-Bench	82.7	71.7
DeepSWE	43.8	—
MCP Atlas	76.8	79.1
Tau2	99.1	92.7
MRCR	—	75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.40	$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.40	$0.43
Context Window	1M	256K
Benchmarks Published	11	9

GLM-5.2 vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

GLM-5.2 leads 7 and Hy3 leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GLM-5.2Hy3

Overall

70.8GLM-5.2

58.7Hy3

RWT

8.5GLM-5.2

8.0Hy3

HLE

54.7GLM-5.2

53.2Hy3

GPQA

91.2GLM-5.2

90.4Hy3

SWE-Pro

62.1GLM-5.2

57.9Hy3

Terminal-Bench

82.7GLM-5.2

71.7Hy3

MCP Atlas

76.8GLM-5.2

79.1Hy3

Tau2

99.1GLM-5.2

92.7Hy3

GLM-5.2

Input$1.40

Output$4.40

Workload$2.28

Context1M

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GLM-5.2 and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.2 and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.2 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Hy3 Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.2 Kimi K3 vs Hy3 Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM-5.2 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Hy3 Grok 4.5 vs GLM-5.2 Grok 4.5 vs Hy3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.