How do GLM-5.3-Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GLM-5.3-Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: GLM-5.3-Flash or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

AskClash compares GLM-5.3-Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side GLM-5.3-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GLM-5.3-Flash model page Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite model page

Rank #7 vs #52AskClash overall scores 71.8 vs 9.7.

Pricing $0.15/$0.50 vs $0.30/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryZ.AI vs Google.

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GLM-5.3-Flash	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Overall Score	71.8	9.7
Leaderboard Rank	#7	#52
ACB	61.2	—
RWT	8.5	7.0
HLE	55.3	—
GPQA	91.2	—
SWE-Pro	—	54.2
Terminal-Bench	84.3	54.0
DeepSWE	63.4	—
GDPval-AA	1773.0	1140.0
OSWorld	—	74.0
Finance Agent	—	47.4
CharXiv	89.4	—
MRCR	—	72.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.15	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.50	$2.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	8	7

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite head-to-head charts

GLM-5.3-Flash leads 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads 0 of 4 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GLM-5.3-FlashGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Overall

71.8GLM-5.3-Flash

9.7Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

RWT

8.5GLM-5.3-Flash

7.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Terminal-Bench

84.3GLM-5.3-Flash

54.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

GDPval-AA

1773.0GLM-5.3-Flash

1140.0Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

GLM-5.3-Flash

Input$0.15

Output$0.50

Workload$0.25

Context1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Input$0.30

Output$2.50

Workload$0.80

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GLM-5.3-Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.3-Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash GLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Grok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.