Which is better: GLM-5.3-Flash or Hy3?

AskClash compares GLM-5.3-Flash and Hy3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do GLM-5.3-Flash and Hy3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GLM-5.3-Flash and Hy3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard GLM-5.3-Flash model page Hy3 model page

Rank #7 vs #31AskClash overall scores 71.8 vs 35.6.

Pricing $0.15/$0.50 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightZ.AI vs Tencent.

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GLM-5.3-Flash	Hy3
Overall Score	71.8	35.6
Leaderboard Rank	#7	#31
ACB	61.2	—
RWT	8.5	8.0
HLE	55.3	53.2
GPQA	91.2	90.4
SWE-bench	—	78.0
SWE-Pro	—	57.9
Terminal-Bench	84.3	71.7
DeepSWE	63.4	—
GDPval-AA	1773.0	—
MCP Atlas	—	79.1
CharXiv	89.4	—
Tau2	—	92.7
MRCR	—	75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.15	$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.50	$0.43
Context Window	1M	256K
Benchmarks Published	8	9

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

GLM-5.3-Flash leads 5 and Hy3 leads 0 of 5 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GLM-5.3-FlashHy3

Overall

71.8GLM-5.3-Flash

35.6Hy3

RWT

8.5GLM-5.3-Flash

8.0Hy3

HLE

55.3GLM-5.3-Flash

53.2Hy3

GPQA

91.2GLM-5.3-Flash

90.4Hy3

Terminal-Bench

84.3GLM-5.3-Flash

71.7Hy3

GLM-5.3-Flash

Input$0.15

Output$0.50

Workload$0.25

Context1M

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GLM-5.3-Flash and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how GLM-5.3-Flash and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Opus 5 vs Hy3 Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash GLM-5.3 vs Hy3 Grok 4.6 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Grok 4.6 vs Hy3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-5.6 Sol vs Hy3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.