Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.7: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.7 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GLM-5.3-Flash ranks higher (#19 vs #41) and wins 6 of 6 shared benchmarks; GLM-5.3-Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.50 vs $0.95/$4.00 per 1M tokens).
Rank #19 vs #41AskClash overall scores 59.6 vs 42.0.
Pricing $0.15/$0.50 vs $0.95/$4.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightZ.AI vs Moonshot AI.
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.7 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Kimi K2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 59.6 | 42.0 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #19 | #41 |
| ACB | 61.2 | 43.0 |
| RWT | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| HLE | 55.3 | 35.0 |
| GPQA | 91.2 | 89.6 |
| IFEval | — | 63.1 |
| Terminal-Bench | 32.8 | — |
| DeepSWE | 63.4 | 30.5 |
| GDPval-AA | 1773.0 | 1037.2 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 76.0 |
| Finance Agent | 57.9 | — |
| CharXiv | 89.4 | — |
| Tau2 | — | 90.1 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.95 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.50 | $4.00 |
| Context Window | 1M | 256K |
| Benchmarks Published | 11 | 9 |
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.7 head-to-head charts
GLM-5.3-Flash leads 7 and Kimi K2.7 leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GLM-5.3-FlashKimi K2.7
Overall
ACB
RWT
HLE
GPQA
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
GLM-5.3-Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.50
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Kimi K2.7
Input$0.95
Output$4.00
Workload$1.75
Context256K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GLM-5.3-Flash and Kimi K2.7 comparisons
Explore how GLM-5.3-Flash and Kimi K2.7 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K2.7Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Kimi K2.7
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.