LLM Comparison

GPT-5.4 xHigh vs Qwen3.5 397B: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-5.4 xHigh vs Qwen3.5 397B comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #7 vs #19AskClash overall scores 73.5 vs 49.5.
Pricing $2.50/$15.0 vs $0.60/$3.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightOpenAI vs Alibaba.

GPT-5.4 xHigh vs Qwen3.5 397B benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGPT-5.4 xHighQwen3.5 397B
Overall Score73.549.5
Leaderboard Rank#7#19
RWT8.0
Coding Agent Index71.1
HLE52.128.7
GPQA92.888.4
IFEval92.6
SWE-bench76.2
SWE-Pro57.7
Terminal-Bench75.1
LiveCodeBench83.6
OSWorld75.0
MCP Atlas70.646.1
CharXiv82.880.8
MMMU-Pro81.279.0
ARC-AGI 273.3
Tau298.983.9
MRCR97.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.60
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$15.0$3.60
Context Window1.05M128K
Benchmark Cells149

More GPT-5.4 xHigh and Qwen3.5 397B comparisons

Explore how GPT-5.4 xHigh and Qwen3.5 397B stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.