LLM Comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.6 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.6 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #8 vs #17AskClash overall scores 76.6 vs 62.9.
Pricing $2.50/$15.0 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs Google.

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.6 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGPT-5.6 TerraGemini 3.6 Flash
Overall Score76.662.9
Leaderboard Rank#8#17
RWT8.5
Coding Agent Index77.0
HLE38.0
GPQA92.992.8
SWE-Pro63.458.7
SWE-Atlas81.0
Terminal-Bench87.478.0
DeepSWE69.649.0
OSWorld83.0
Finance Agent52.4
CharXiv85.2
MMMU-Pro80.783.2
ARC-AGI 283.9
Tau286.3
MRCR89.691.8
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.50$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$15.0$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1311

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.6 Flash head-to-head charts

GPT-5.6 Terra leads 5 and Gemini 3.6 Flash leads 2 of 7 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-5.6 TerraGemini 3.6 Flash
Overall
76.6GPT-5.6 Terra
62.9Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPQA
92.9GPT-5.6 Terra
92.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
SWE-Pro
63.4GPT-5.6 Terra
58.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
Terminal-Bench
87.4GPT-5.6 Terra
78.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
DeepSWE
69.6GPT-5.6 Terra
49.0Gemini 3.6 Flash
MMMU-Pro
80.7GPT-5.6 Terra
83.2Gemini 3.6 Flash
MRCR
89.6GPT-5.6 Terra
91.8Gemini 3.6 Flash
GPT-5.6 Terra
Input$2.50
Output$15.0
Workload$5.50
Context1M
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.6 Flash comparisons

Explore how GPT-5.6 Terra and Gemini 3.6 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.