Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#6 vs #22) and wins 6 of 8 shared benchmarks; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.60 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #6 vs #22AskClash overall scores 72.5 vs 58.0.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.15/$0.60Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs APIOpenAI vs DeepSeek.
GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 72.5 | 58.0 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #6 | #22 |
| ACB | 69.9 | 63.0 |
| Coding Agent Index | 62.9 | — |
| HLE | 52.9 | 36.8 |
| GPQA | 95.0 | 90.9 |
| SWE-Atlas | 61.0 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 56.1 | 26.8 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2 | 74.2 |
| GDPval-AA | 1575.1 | 1600.0 |
| Finance Agent | 52.0 | 53.5 |
| MMMU-Pro | 86.0 | 77.0 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 94.2 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.15 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $0.60 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 14 | 11 |
GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash head-to-head charts
GPT-6.1 Sol leads 7 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 2 of 9 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Overall
ACB
HLE
GPQA
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
MMMU-Pro
GPT-6.1 Sol
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1.05M
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.60
Workload$0.27
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GPT-6.1 Sol and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash comparisons
Explore how GPT-6.1 Sol and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 SolClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.