Which is better: GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Astra?

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#6 vs #7); GPT-6 Astra wins 9 of 11 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#6 vs #7); GPT-6 Astra wins 9 of 11 shared benchmarks; GPT-6.1 Sol costs less ($2.00/$10.0 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard GPT-6.1 Sol model page GPT-6 Astra model page

Rank #6 vs #7AskClash overall scores 72.5 vs 72.4.

Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $10.0/$50.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryOpenAI vs OpenAI.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	GPT-6.1 Sol	GPT-6 Astra
Overall Score	72.5	72.4
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#7
ACB	69.9	64.5
RWT	—	9.5
Coding Agent Index	62.9	67.0
HLE	52.9	57.2
GPQA	95.0	96.0
SWE-Atlas	61.0	61.8
Terminal-Bench	56.1	59.1
DeepSWE	75.2	73.2
GDPval-AA	1575.1	1629.3
Finance Agent	52.0	53.5
MMMU-Pro	86.0	87.0
ARC-AGI 2	94.2	95.0
MRCR	—	100.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$10.0
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$50.0
Context Window	1.05M	1.05M
Benchmarks Published	14	14

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra head-to-head charts

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 3 and GPT-6 Astra leads 9 of 12 shared benchmarks. GPT-6.1 Sol is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra

Overall

72.5GPT-6.1 Sol

72.4GPT-6 Astra

ACB

69.9GPT-6.1 Sol

64.5GPT-6 Astra

Coding Agent Index

62.9GPT-6.1 Sol

67.0GPT-6 Astra

HLE

52.9GPT-6.1 Sol

57.2GPT-6 Astra

GPQA

95.0GPT-6.1 Sol

96.0GPT-6 Astra

SWE-Atlas

61.0GPT-6.1 Sol

61.8GPT-6 Astra

Terminal-Bench

56.1GPT-6.1 Sol

59.1GPT-6 Astra

DeepSWE

75.2GPT-6.1 Sol

73.2GPT-6 Astra

GDPval-AA

1575.1GPT-6.1 Sol

1629.3GPT-6 Astra

Finance Agent

52.0GPT-6.1 Sol

53.5GPT-6 Astra

MMMU-Pro

86.0GPT-6.1 Sol

87.0GPT-6 Astra

ARC-AGI 2

94.2GPT-6.1 Sol

95.0GPT-6 Astra

GPT-6.1 Sol

Input$2.00

Output$10.0

Workload$4.00

Context1.05M

GPT-6 Astra

Input$10.0

Output$50.0

Workload$20

Context1.05M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra comparisons

Explore how GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.