LLM Comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher (#8 vs #9); Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 5 of 7 shared benchmarks.

Rank #8 vs #9AskClash overall scores 69.8 vs 68.4.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $2.00/$10.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightOpenAI vs Moonshot AI.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro
Overall Score69.868.4
Leaderboard Rank#8#9
ACB69.9—
Coding Agent Index62.9—
HLE52.970.0
GPQA95.094.2
SWE-Atlas61.0—
Terminal-Bench56.167.2
DeepSWE75.275.5
GDPval-AA1575.11845.7
Finance Agent52.058.6
CharXiv—89.0
MMMU-Pro86.084.1
ARC-AGI 294.2—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$10.0
Context Window1.05M1M
Benchmarks Published1411

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

GPT-6.1 Sol leads 3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro leads 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

GPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro
Overall
69.8GPT-6.1 Sol
68.4Kimi K3.1 Pro
HLE
52.9GPT-6.1 Sol
70.0Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA
95.0GPT-6.1 Sol
94.2Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench
56.1GPT-6.1 Sol
67.2Kimi K3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
75.2GPT-6.1 Sol
75.5Kimi K3.1 Pro
GDPval-AA
1575.1GPT-6.1 Sol
1845.7Kimi K3.1 Pro
Finance Agent
52.0GPT-6.1 Sol
58.6Kimi K3.1 Pro
MMMU-Pro
86.0GPT-6.1 Sol
84.1Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPT-6.1 Sol
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1.05M
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More GPT-6.1 Sol and Kimi K3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how GPT-6.1 Sol and Kimi K3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.