Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3-Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3-Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: GPT-6 Astra ranks higher (#8 vs #20) and wins 6 of 8 shared benchmarks; GLM-5.3-Flash costs less ($0.15/$0.50 vs $10.0/$50.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #8 vs #20AskClash overall scores 70.8 vs 59.2.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.15/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs Open WeightOpenAI vs Z.AI.
GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3-Flash benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70.8 | 59.2 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #8 | #20 |
| ACB | 64.5 | 61.2 |
| RWT | 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Coding Agent Index | 67.0 | — |
| HLE | 57.2 | 55.3 |
| GPQA | 96.0 | 91.2 |
| Terminal-Bench | 59.1 | 32.8 |
| DeepSWE | 73.2 | 63.4 |
| GDPval-AA | 1629.3 | 1773.0 |
| Finance Agent | 53.5 | 57.9 |
| CharXiv | — | 89.4 |
| MMMU-Pro | 87.0 | — |
| ARC-AGI 2 | 95.0 | — |
| MRCR | 100.0 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $0.15 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $50.0 | $0.50 |
| Context Window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 13 | 11 |
GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3-Flash head-to-head charts
GPT-6 Astra leads 7 and GLM-5.3-Flash leads 2 of 9 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
GPT-6 AstraGLM-5.3-Flash
Overall
ACB
RWT
HLE
GPQA
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
GPT-6 Astra
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1.05M
GLM-5.3-Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.50
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More GPT-6 Astra and GLM-5.3-Flash comparisons
Explore how GPT-6 Astra and GLM-5.3-Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.