Which is better: Grok 4.7 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Verdict: Grok 4.7 ranks higher (#24 vs #32) and wins 4 of 5 shared benchmarks; Grok 4.7 costs less ($2.00/$6.00 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Grok 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Grok 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Grok 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Grok 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Grok 4.7 ranks higher (#24 vs #32) and wins 4 of 5 shared benchmarks; Grok 4.7 costs less ($2.00/$6.00 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Grok 4.7 model page Claude Sonnet 5 model page

Rank #24 vs #32AskClash overall scores 56.8 vs 52.6.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryxAI vs Anthropic.

Grok 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Grok 4.7	Claude Sonnet 5
Overall Score	56.8	52.6
Leaderboard Rank	#24	#32
ACB	66.4	60.8
RWT	—	8.5
Coding Agent Index	56.0	—
HLE	43.1	57.4
GPQA	—	91.1
SWE-bench	—	85.2
SWE-Pro	—	63.2
SWE-Atlas	63.0	—
Terminal-Bench	25.8	14.1
DeepSWE	73.0	53.8
GDPval-AA	1695.2	1618.0
OSWorld	—	81.2
Finance Agent	49.2	—
CharXiv	—	88.3
MMMU-Pro	—	77.3
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$15.0
Context Window	500K	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	12

Grok 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

Grok 4.7 leads 5 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 1 of 6 shared benchmarks. Grok 4.7 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Grok 4.7Claude Sonnet 5

Overall

56.8Grok 4.7

52.6Claude Sonnet 5

ACB

66.4Grok 4.7

60.8Claude Sonnet 5

HLE

43.1Grok 4.7

57.4Claude Sonnet 5

Terminal-Bench

25.8Grok 4.7

14.1Claude Sonnet 5

DeepSWE

73.0Grok 4.7

53.8Claude Sonnet 5

GDPval-AA

1695.2Grok 4.7

1618.0Claude Sonnet 5

Grok 4.7

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context500K

Claude Sonnet 5

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Grok 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how Grok 4.7 and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.7 Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.