LLM Comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Grok 4.7 ranks higher (#28 vs #30) and wins 4 of 5 shared benchmarks.

Rank #28 vs #30AskClash overall scores 51.6 vs 51.4.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryxAI vs Google.

Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricGrok 4.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
Overall Score51.651.4
Leaderboard Rank#28#30
ACB66.464.2
AutomationBench-AA65.6—
Coding Agent Index46.633.3
HLE—54.9
SWE-Atlas62.944.4
Terminal-Bench 4.025.819.7
DeepSWE—73.8
GDPval-AA—1545.0
Finance Agent v2.160.665.8
CharXiv—86.2
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$7.50
Context Window500K1M
Benchmarks Published79

Gemini 3.8 Flash: its ACB is a provisional diagnostic result.

Grok 4.7 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash head-to-head charts

Grok 4.7 leads 4 and Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 1 of 5 shared benchmarks. Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Grok 4.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
Overall
51.6Grok 4.7
51.4Gemini 3.8 Flash
ACB
66.4Grok 4.7
64.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
Coding Agent Index
46.6Grok 4.7
33.3Gemini 3.8 Flash
SWE-Atlas
62.9Grok 4.7
44.4Gemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.0
25.8Grok 4.7
19.7Gemini 3.8 Flash
Finance Agent v2.1
60.6Grok 4.7
65.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
Grok 4.7
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context500K
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Grok 4.7 and Gemini 3.8 Flash comparisons

Explore how Grok 4.7 and Gemini 3.8 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.