Which is better: Hy3 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Verdict: Hy3 ranks higher (#38 vs #44); Qwen3.7 Max wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; Hy3 costs less ($0.12/$0.43 vs $2.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Max: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Hy3 ranks higher (#38 vs #44); Qwen3.7 Max wins 4 of 7 shared benchmarks; Hy3 costs less ($0.12/$0.43 vs $2.50/$7.50 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Hy3 model page Qwen3.7 Max model page

Rank #38 vs #44AskClash overall scores 45.5 vs 39.7.

Pricing $0.12/$0.43 vs $2.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs ProprietaryTencent vs Alibaba.

Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Max benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Hy3	Qwen3.7 Max
Overall Score	45.5	39.7
Leaderboard Rank	#38	#44
RWT	8.0	7.5
HLE	53.2	41.4
GPQA	90.4	92.4
IFEval	—	94.3
SWE-bench	78.0	80.4
SWE-Pro	57.9	—
GDPval-AA	—	1546.0
MCP Atlas	79.1	76.4
Finance Agent	—	48.4
Tau2	92.7	94.7
MRCR	75.1	90.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.12	$2.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.43	$7.50
Context Window	256K	1M
Benchmarks Published	5	6

Hy3 vs Qwen3.7 Max head-to-head charts

Hy3 leads 4 and Qwen3.7 Max leads 4 of 8 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Hy3Qwen3.7 Max

Overall

45.5Hy3

39.7Qwen3.7 Max

RWT

8.0Hy3

7.5Qwen3.7 Max

HLE

53.2Hy3

41.4Qwen3.7 Max

GPQA

90.4Hy3

92.4Qwen3.7 Max

SWE-bench

78.0Hy3

80.4Qwen3.7 Max

MCP Atlas

79.1Hy3

76.4Qwen3.7 Max

Tau2

92.7Hy3

94.7Qwen3.7 Max

MRCR

75.1Hy3

90.4Qwen3.7 Max

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Qwen3.7 Max

Input$2.50

Output$7.50

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max comparisons

Explore how Hy3 and Qwen3.7 Max stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Hy3 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Hy3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hy3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Opus 5 vs Hy3 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.