Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks higher (#4 vs #67) and wins 6 of 7 shared benchmarks; Qwen3.8 Flash Next costs less ($0.16/$0.47 vs $2.00/$10.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #4 vs #67AskClash overall scores 75.5 vs 56.3.
Pricing $2.00/$10.0 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightMoonshot AI vs Alibaba.
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.8 Flash Next |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 75.5 | 56.3 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #4 | #67 |
| ACB | — | 66.5 |
| HLE | 70.0 | 35.9 |
| GPQA | 94.2 | 91.7 |
| IFEval | — | 81.3 |
| SWE-Pro | — | 62.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 65.7 | 25.2 |
| DeepSWE | 75.5 | 58.7 |
| GDPval-AA | 1846.0 | 1743.0 |
| Finance Agent | 58.6 | — |
| CharXiv | 89.0 | 90.6 |
| MMMU-Pro | 84.1 | 79.8 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.16 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $10.0 | $0.47 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 12 |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads 7 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
HLE
GPQA
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
CharXiv
MMMU-Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$10.0
Workload$4.00
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons
Explore how Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextKimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.