How do Muse Spark 1.1 and Claude Sonnet 5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Claude Sonnet 5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Claude Sonnet 5?

AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.1 and Claude Sonnet 5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.1 model page Claude Sonnet 5 model page

Rank #6 vs #8AskClash overall scores 77.5 vs 77.0.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Anthropic.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.1	Claude Sonnet 5
Overall Score	77.5	77.0
Leaderboard Rank	#6	#8
RWT	7.5	8.5
HLE	62.1	57.4
GPQA	—	91.1
SWE-bench	—	85.2
SWE-Pro	61.5	63.2
Terminal-Bench	80.0	80.4
DeepSWE	—	53.8
OSWorld	80.8	81.2
MCP Atlas	88.1	—
Finance Agent	57.2	—
CharXiv	88.4	88.3
MMMU-Pro	—	77.3
MRCR	54.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$15.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	11

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.1 leads 3 and Claude Sonnet 5 leads 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.1Claude Sonnet 5

Overall

77.5Muse Spark 1.1

77.0Claude Sonnet 5

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.1

8.5Claude Sonnet 5

HLE

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

57.4Claude Sonnet 5

SWE-Pro

61.5Muse Spark 1.1

63.2Claude Sonnet 5

Terminal-Bench

80.0Muse Spark 1.1

80.4Claude Sonnet 5

OSWorld

80.8Muse Spark 1.1

81.2Claude Sonnet 5

CharXiv

88.4Muse Spark 1.1

88.3Claude Sonnet 5

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Claude Sonnet 5

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.1 and Claude Sonnet 5 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.1 and Claude Sonnet 5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5 Grok 4.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Grok 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5 GPT-5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.