How do Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?

AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.1 model page Muse Spark 1.2 model page

Rank #27 vs #31AskClash overall scores 58.2 vs 56.3.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Meta.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.1	Muse Spark 1.2
Overall Score	58.2	56.3
Leaderboard Rank	#27	#31
ACB	51.3	54.8
RWT	7.5	7.5
HLE	62.1	45.5
GPQA	89.8	90.4
SWE-Pro	61.5	—
Terminal-Bench	80.0	—
DeepSWE	53.3	59.0
GDPval-AA	1381.0	1523.3
OSWorld	80.8	—
MCP Atlas	88.1	82.2
Finance Agent	57.2	60.6
CharXiv	88.4	—
MRCR	54.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$4.25
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	13	8

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.1 leads 3 and Muse Spark 1.2 leads 5 of 9 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.1Muse Spark 1.2

Overall

58.2Muse Spark 1.1

56.3Muse Spark 1.2

ACB

51.3Muse Spark 1.1

54.8Muse Spark 1.2

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.1

7.5Muse Spark 1.2

HLE

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

45.5Muse Spark 1.2

GPQA

89.8Muse Spark 1.1

90.4Muse Spark 1.2

DeepSWE

53.3Muse Spark 1.1

59.0Muse Spark 1.2

GDPval-AA

1381.0Muse Spark 1.1

1523.3Muse Spark 1.2

MCP Atlas

88.1Muse Spark 1.1

82.2Muse Spark 1.2

Finance Agent

57.2Muse Spark 1.1

60.6Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Muse Spark 1.2

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.2 Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1 Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.2

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.