Which is better: Muse Spark 1.2 or Muse Spark 1.1?

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher (#27 vs #28) and wins 5 of 8 shared benchmarks. AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher (#27 vs #28) and wins 5 of 8 shared benchmarks.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.2 model page Muse Spark 1.1 model page

Rank #27 vs #28AskClash overall scores 55.4 vs 55.4.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Meta.

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.2	Muse Spark 1.1
Overall Score	55.4	55.4
Leaderboard Rank	#27	#28
ACB	54.8	51.3
RWT	7.5	7.5
HLE	45.5	62.1
GPQA	90.4	89.8
SWE-Pro	—	61.5
DeepSWE	59.0	53.3
GDPval-AA	1477.5	1381.0
OSWorld	—	80.8
MCP Atlas	82.2	88.1
Finance Agent	60.6	57.2
CharXiv	—	88.4
MRCR	—	54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$4.25
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	10	12

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.2 leads 6 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 2 of 9 shared benchmarks. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.2Muse Spark 1.1

Overall

55.4Muse Spark 1.2

55.4Muse Spark 1.1

ACB

54.8Muse Spark 1.2

51.3Muse Spark 1.1

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.2

7.5Muse Spark 1.1

HLE

45.5Muse Spark 1.2

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

GPQA

90.4Muse Spark 1.2

89.8Muse Spark 1.1

DeepSWE

59.0Muse Spark 1.2

53.3Muse Spark 1.1

GDPval-AA

1477.5Muse Spark 1.2

1381.0Muse Spark 1.1

MCP Atlas

82.2Muse Spark 1.2

88.1Muse Spark 1.1

Finance Agent

60.6Muse Spark 1.2

57.2Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.2

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.2 and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.