Which is better: Muse Spark 1.3 or Claude Haiku 5.5?

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher (#11 vs #16); Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Haiku 5.5 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Haiku 5.5 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Haiku 5.5 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher (#11 vs #16); Claude Haiku 5.5 costs less ($0.10/$0.50 vs $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.3 model page Claude Haiku 5.5 model page

Rank #11 vs #16AskClash overall scores 63.6 vs 60.0.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $0.10/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Anthropic.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.3	Claude Haiku 5.5
Overall Score	63.6	60.0
Leaderboard Rank	#11	#16
ACB	62.6	63.5
RWT	7.5	—
Coding Agent Index	54.3	—
HLE	49.1	57.4
GPQA	93.8	—
SWE-Pro	—	64.8
SWE-Atlas	59.4	—
Terminal-Bench	33.3	32.8
DeepSWE	75.4	—
GDPval-AA	1754.0	1620.0
Finance Agent	58.9	—
MRCR	98.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$0.10
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$0.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	12	8

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 3 and Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 2 of 5 shared benchmarks. Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.3Claude Haiku 5.5

Overall

63.6Muse Spark 1.3

60.0Claude Haiku 5.5

ACB

62.6Muse Spark 1.3

63.5Claude Haiku 5.5

HLE

49.1Muse Spark 1.3

57.4Claude Haiku 5.5

Terminal-Bench

33.3Muse Spark 1.3

32.8Claude Haiku 5.5

GDPval-AA

1754.0Muse Spark 1.3

1620.0Claude Haiku 5.5

Muse Spark 1.3

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Claude Haiku 5.5

Input$0.10

Output$0.50

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Haiku 5.5 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.3 and Claude Haiku 5.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.