How do Muse Spark 1.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Muse Spark 1.3 or GLM-5.3-Flash?

AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.3 model page GLM-5.3-Flash model page

Rank #12 vs #15AskClash overall scores 62.4 vs 60.5.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $0.15/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightMeta vs Z.AI.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.3	GLM-5.3-Flash
Overall Score	62.4	60.5
Leaderboard Rank	#12	#15
ACB	55.5	61.2
RWT	7.5	8.5
HLE	49.1	55.3
GPQA	93.8	91.2
SWE-Atlas	59.4	—
Terminal-Bench	88.8	84.3
DeepSWE	75.4	63.4
GDPval-AA	1754.0	1773.0
Finance Agent	—	57.9
CharXiv	—	89.4
MRCR	98.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$0.15
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$0.50
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	9

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 4 and GLM-5.3-Flash leads 4 of 8 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.3GLM-5.3-Flash

Overall

62.4Muse Spark 1.3

60.5GLM-5.3-Flash

ACB

55.5Muse Spark 1.3

61.2GLM-5.3-Flash

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.3

8.5GLM-5.3-Flash

HLE

49.1Muse Spark 1.3

55.3GLM-5.3-Flash

GPQA

93.8Muse Spark 1.3

91.2GLM-5.3-Flash

Terminal-Bench

88.8Muse Spark 1.3

84.3GLM-5.3-Flash

DeepSWE

75.4Muse Spark 1.3

63.4GLM-5.3-Flash

GDPval-AA

1754.0Muse Spark 1.3

1773.0GLM-5.3-Flash

Muse Spark 1.3

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

GLM-5.3-Flash

Input$0.15

Output$0.50

Workload$0.25

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.3 and GLM-5.3-Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-6 Astra vs Muse Spark 1.3 GPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3-Flash GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3-Flash Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.