Which is better: Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K3?

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher (#34 vs #73) and wins 7 of 8 shared benchmarks; Muse Spark 1.3 costs less ($1.25/$4.25 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher (#34 vs #73) and wins 7 of 8 shared benchmarks; Muse Spark 1.3 costs less ($1.25/$4.25 vs $3.00/$15.0 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.3 model page Kimi K3 model page

Rank #34 vs #73AskClash overall scores 62.2 vs 56.1.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $3.00/$15.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightMeta vs Moonshot AI.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.3	Kimi K3
Overall Score	62.2	56.1
Leaderboard Rank	#34	#73
ACB	62.6	57.7
RWT	7.5	8.0
HLE	49.1	43.5
GPQA	93.8	93.5
SWE-Atlas	59.4	—
Terminal-Bench	33.3	12.6
DeepSWE	75.4	68.5
GDPval-AA	1754.0	1668.0
MCP Atlas	—	84.2
Finance Agent	58.9	53.1
CharXiv	—	84.8
MMMU-Pro	—	81.6
MRCR	98.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$3.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$15.0
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	13

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 8 and Kimi K3 leads 1 of 9 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.3Kimi K3

Overall

62.2Muse Spark 1.3

56.1Kimi K3

ACB

62.6Muse Spark 1.3

57.7Kimi K3

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.3

8.0Kimi K3

HLE

49.1Muse Spark 1.3

43.5Kimi K3

GPQA

93.8Muse Spark 1.3

93.5Kimi K3

Terminal-Bench

33.3Muse Spark 1.3

12.6Kimi K3

DeepSWE

75.4Muse Spark 1.3

68.5Kimi K3

GDPval-AA

1754.0Muse Spark 1.3

1668.0Kimi K3

Finance Agent

58.9Muse Spark 1.3

53.1Kimi K3

Muse Spark 1.3

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Kimi K3

Input$3.00

Output$15.0

Workload$6.00

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3 Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Kimi K3 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.