Which is better: Muse Spark 1.3 or MiniMax-M3?

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher (#13 vs #46) and wins 5 of 6 shared benchmarks; MiniMax-M3 costs less ($0.30/$1.20 vs $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens). AskClash compares Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax-M3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax-M3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax-M3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher (#13 vs #46) and wins 5 of 6 shared benchmarks; MiniMax-M3 costs less ($0.30/$1.20 vs $1.25/$4.25 per 1M tokens).

Open live leaderboard Muse Spark 1.3 model page MiniMax-M3 model page

Rank #13 vs #46AskClash overall scores 62.9 vs 41.4.

Pricing $1.25/$4.25 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs Open WeightMeta vs MiniMax.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Muse Spark 1.3	MiniMax-M3
Overall Score	62.9	41.4
Leaderboard Rank	#13	#46
ACB	62.6	29.8
RWT	7.5	8.5
HLE	49.1	37.1
GPQA	93.8	92.9
IFEval	—	82.9
SWE-bench	—	80.5
SWE-Pro	—	59.0
SWE-Atlas	59.4	—
Terminal-Bench	33.3	—
DeepSWE	75.4	—
GDPval-AA	1754.0	58.4
OSWorld	—	70.1
MCP Atlas	—	74.2
Finance Agent	58.9	48.3
MMMU-Pro	—	78.1
Tau2	—	88.9
MRCR	98.1	—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$1.25	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$4.25	$1.20
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	11

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts

Muse Spark 1.3 leads 6 and MiniMax-M3 leads 1 of 7 shared benchmarks. MiniMax-M3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Muse Spark 1.3MiniMax-M3

Overall

62.9Muse Spark 1.3

41.4MiniMax-M3

ACB

62.6Muse Spark 1.3

29.8MiniMax-M3

RWT

7.5Muse Spark 1.3

8.5MiniMax-M3

HLE

49.1Muse Spark 1.3

37.1MiniMax-M3

GPQA

93.8Muse Spark 1.3

92.9MiniMax-M3

GDPval-AA

1754.0Muse Spark 1.3

58.4MiniMax-M3

Finance Agent

58.9Muse Spark 1.3

48.3MiniMax-M3

Muse Spark 1.3

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

MiniMax-M3

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Workload$0.54

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax-M3 comparisons

Explore how Muse Spark 1.3 and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.