Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 4.8: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 4.8 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Verdict: Muse Wonder ranks higher (#11 vs #15) and wins 4 of 6 shared benchmarks; Muse Wonder costs less ($4.00/$20.0 vs $5.00/$25.0 per 1M tokens).
Rank #11 vs #15AskClash overall scores 64.7 vs 60.9.
Pricing $4.00/$20.0 vs $5.00/$25.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryMeta vs Anthropic.
Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Muse Wonder | Claude Opus 4.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 64.7 | 60.9 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #11 | #15 |
| ACB | 62.3 | 60.1 |
| RWT | — | 9.0 |
| Coding Agent Index | — | 72.5 |
| HLE | 50.1 | 57.9 |
| GPQA | — | 93.6 |
| IFEval | — | 62.2 |
| SWE-bench | — | 88.6 |
| SWE-Pro | — | 69.2 |
| SWE-Atlas | — | 82.5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 52.0 | 21.7 |
| DeepSWE | 78.8 | 59.0 |
| GDPval-AA | 1770.3 | 1889.8 |
| OSWorld | — | 83.4 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 82.2 |
| Finance Agent | 56.6 | 53.9 |
| CharXiv | — | 89.9 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 72.1 |
| Tau2 | — | 94.4 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $4.00 | $5.00 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $20.0 | $25.0 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 16 |
Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 4.8 head-to-head charts
Muse Wonder leads 5 and Claude Opus 4.8 leads 2 of 7 shared benchmarks. Muse Wonder is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Muse WonderClaude Opus 4.8
Overall
ACB
HLE
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
GDPval-AA
Finance Agent
Muse Wonder
Input$4.00
Output$20.0
Workload$8.00
Context1M
Claude Opus 4.8
Input$5.00
Output$25.0
Workload$10
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 4.8 comparisons
Explore how Muse Wonder and Claude Opus 4.8 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse WonderClaude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse WonderClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse WonderClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Opus 5 vs Muse WonderClaude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8Claude Fable 5 vs Muse WonderClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.