How do Qwen3.7 Max and Muse Spark 1.1 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.7 Max and Muse Spark 1.1 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.7 Max or Muse Spark 1.1?

AskClash compares Qwen3.7 Max and Muse Spark 1.1 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.7 Max model page Muse Spark 1.1 model page

Rank #9 vs #13AskClash overall scores 71.2 vs 68.1.

Pricing $2.50/$7.50 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Meta.

Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.7 Max	Muse Spark 1.1
Overall Score	71.2	68.1
Leaderboard Rank	#9	#13
RWT	7.5	7.5
HLE	41.4	62.1
GPQA	92.4	—
IFEval	94.3	—
SWE-bench	80.4	—
SWE-Pro	—	61.5
Terminal-Bench	69.7	80.0
OSWorld	—	80.8
MCP Atlas	76.4	88.1
Finance Agent	48.4	57.2
CharXiv	—	88.4
Tau2	94.7	—
MRCR	90.4	54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.50	$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$7.50	$4.25
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	10

Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.7 Max leads 2 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 4 of 7 shared benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.7 MaxMuse Spark 1.1

Overall

71.2Qwen3.7 Max

68.1Muse Spark 1.1

RWT

7.5Qwen3.7 Max

7.5Muse Spark 1.1

HLE

41.4Qwen3.7 Max

62.1Muse Spark 1.1

Terminal-Bench

69.7Qwen3.7 Max

80.0Muse Spark 1.1

MCP Atlas

76.4Qwen3.7 Max

88.1Muse Spark 1.1

Finance Agent

48.4Qwen3.7 Max

57.2Muse Spark 1.1

MRCR

90.4Qwen3.7 Max

54.1Muse Spark 1.1

Qwen3.7 Max

Input$2.50

Output$7.50

Workload$4.00

Context1M

Muse Spark 1.1

Input$1.25

Output$4.25

Workload$2.10

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.7 Max and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.7 Max and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Opus 4.8 vs Muse Spark 1.1 Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 Max Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.1

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.