Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #17 vs #22AskClash overall scores 57.0 vs 53.9.
Pricing $0.45/$3.20 vs $0.14/$0.28Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs DeepSeek.
Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 27B | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.0 | 53.9 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #17 | #22 |
| ACB | 56.4 | 48.0 |
| HLE | 30.8 | 37.0 |
| GPQA | 89.2 | 91.0 |
| MATH-500 | — | 57.4 |
| IFEval | 79.5 | — |
| SWE-bench | — | 79.0 |
| SWE-Pro | 61.7 | — |
| Terminal-Bench | 73.0 | 82.7 |
| DeepSWE | 42.2 | 54.4 |
| OSWorld | 84.3 | — |
| MCP Atlas | — | 69.0 |
| Finance Agent | — | 49.5 |
| CharXiv | 90.2 | — |
| MRCR | — | 78.7 |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.45 | $0.14 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $3.20 | $0.28 |
| Context Window | 262K | 1M |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 10 |
Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 head-to-head charts
Qwen3.8 27B leads 2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 leads 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Qwen3.8 27BDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Overall
ACB
HLE
GPQA
Terminal-Bench
DeepSWE
Qwen3.8 27B
Input$0.45
Output$3.20
Workload$1.09
Context262K
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 comparisons
Explore how Qwen3.8 27B and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 27BGrok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27BGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 27BKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.