LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 27B model pageGemini 3.7 Flash model page
Rank #28 vs #30AskClash overall scores 56.6 vs 56.5.
Pricing $0.45/$3.20 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 27BGemini 3.7 Flash
Overall Score56.656.5
Leaderboard Rank#28#30
ACB56.438.9
HLE30.853.6
GPQA89.294.5
IFEval79.5—
SWE-Pro61.7—
Terminal-Bench73.085.8
DeepSWE42.265.3
GDPval-AA1463.21525.0
OSWorld84.3—
Finance Agent48.659.0
CharXiv90.284.5
MMMU-Pro76.385.5
MRCR—97.0
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.45$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$3.20$7.50
Context Window262K1M
Benchmarks Published1311

Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 27B leads 3 and Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 7 of 10 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 27BGemini 3.7 Flash
Overall
56.6Qwen3.8 27B
56.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
ACB
56.4Qwen3.8 27B
38.9Gemini 3.7 Flash
HLE
30.8Qwen3.8 27B
53.6Gemini 3.7 Flash
GPQA
89.2Qwen3.8 27B
94.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
Terminal-Bench
73.0Qwen3.8 27B
85.8Gemini 3.7 Flash
DeepSWE
42.2Qwen3.8 27B
65.3Gemini 3.7 Flash
GDPval-AA
1463.2Qwen3.8 27B
1525.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
Finance Agent
48.6Qwen3.8 27B
59.0Gemini 3.7 Flash
CharXiv
90.2Qwen3.8 27B
84.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
MMMU-Pro
76.3Qwen3.8 27B
85.5Gemini 3.7 Flash
Qwen3.8 27B
Input$0.45
Output$3.20
Workload$1.09
Context262K
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.7 Flash comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 27B and Gemini 3.7 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27BClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27BGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 Max vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.