Which is better: Qwen3.8 27B or Hy3?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 27B and Hy3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

How do Qwen3.8 27B and Hy3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 27B and Hy3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 27B model page Hy3 model page

Rank #17 vs #28AskClash overall scores 57.0 vs 44.5.

Pricing $0.45/$3.20 vs $0.12/$0.43Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Tencent.

Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 27B	Hy3
Overall Score	57.0	44.5
Leaderboard Rank	#17	#28
ACB	56.4	—
RWT	—	8.0
HLE	30.8	53.2
GPQA	89.2	90.4
IFEval	79.5	—
SWE-bench	—	78.0
SWE-Pro	61.7	57.9
Terminal-Bench	73.0	71.7
DeepSWE	42.2	—
OSWorld	84.3	—
MCP Atlas	—	79.1
CharXiv	90.2	—
Tau2	—	92.7
MRCR	—	75.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.45	$0.12
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$3.20	$0.43
Context Window	262K	256K
Benchmarks Published	9	9

Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy3 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 27B leads 3 and Hy3 leads 2 of 5 shared benchmarks. Hy3 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 27BHy3

Overall

57.0Qwen3.8 27B

44.5Hy3

HLE

30.8Qwen3.8 27B

53.2Hy3

GPQA

89.2Qwen3.8 27B

90.4Hy3

SWE-Pro

61.7Qwen3.8 27B

57.9Hy3

Terminal-Bench

73.0Qwen3.8 27B

71.7Hy3

Qwen3.8 27B

Input$0.45

Output$3.20

Workload$1.09

Context262K

Hy3

Input$0.12

Output$0.43

Workload$0.21

Context256K

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 27B and Hy3 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 27B and Hy3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B Claude Opus 5 vs Hy3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B Claude Fable 5 vs Hy3 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 27B Grok 4.6 vs Hy3 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 27B GPT-5.6 Sol vs Hy3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 27B Kimi K3 vs Hy3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.