Benchmark scores
Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.
LLM Comparison
Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Composer 2.5: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.
Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Composer 2.5 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.
Rank #19 vs #50AskClash overall scores 57.6 vs 17.7.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $0.50/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Cursor.
Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Composer 2.5 benchmark comparison
Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.
| Metric | Qwen3.8 Flash Next | Composer 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 57.6 | 17.7 |
| Leaderboard Rank | #19 | #50 |
| ACB | 66.5 | 53.2 |
| RWT | — | 8.5 |
| Coding Agent Index | — | 38.3 |
| HLE | 35.9 | — |
| GPQA | 91.7 | — |
| IFEval | 81.3 | — |
| SWE-Pro | 62.5 | 47.0 |
| SWE-Atlas | — | 72.0 |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 69.3 |
| DeepSWE | 58.7 | — |
| GDPval-AA | 1743.0 | — |
| CharXiv | 90.6 | — |
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.16 | $0.50 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.47 | $2.50 |
| Context Window | 1M | 200K |
| Benchmarks Published | 9 | 5 |
Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Composer 2.5 head-to-head charts
Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 3 and Composer 2.5 leads 0 of 3 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.
Qwen3.8 Flash NextComposer 2.5
Overall
ACB
SWE-Pro
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Composer 2.5
Input$0.50
Output$2.50
Workload$1.00
Context200K
Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.
More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Composer 2.5 comparisons
Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Composer 2.5 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Composer 2.5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Composer 2.5Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Composer 2.5GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3 vs Composer 2.5Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Composer 2.5
How to read this comparison
Token pricing
Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.
Coverage matters
Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.
This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.