LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageGemini 3.1 Pro model page
Rank #19 vs #32AskClash overall scores 57.6 vs 36.7.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $2.00/$12.0Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextGemini 3.1 Pro
Overall Score57.636.7
Leaderboard Rank#19#32
ACB66.5—
Coding Agent Index—32.9
HLE35.951.4
GPQA91.794.3
IFEval81.3—
SWE-bench—80.6
SWE-Pro62.554.2
Terminal-Bench—68.5
DeepSWE58.711.7
GDPval-AA1743.01317.0
MCP Atlas—69.2
Finance Agent—43.0
CharXiv90.680.2
MMMU-Pro—83.9
ARC-AGI 2—77.1
Tau2—99.3
MRCR—84.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$12.0
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published916

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro leads 2 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextGemini 3.1 Pro
Overall
57.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
36.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
51.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
94.3Gemini 3.1 Pro
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
54.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
11.7Gemini 3.1 Pro
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1317.0Gemini 3.1 Pro
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
80.2Gemini 3.1 Pro
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Input$2.00
Output$12.0
Workload$4.40
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Gemini 3.1 Pro comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Gemini 3.1 Pro stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3 vs Gemini 3.1 ProGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.