LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.8 Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.8 Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageGemini 3.8 Flash model page
Rank #8 vs #10AskClash overall scores 65.7 vs 65.1.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $1.50/$7.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Google.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.8 Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextGemini 3.8 Flash
Overall Score65.765.1
Leaderboard Rank#8#10
ACB66.561.1
Coding Agent Index—41.9
HLE35.954.9
GPQA91.795.3
IFEval81.3—
SWE-Pro62.5—
SWE-Atlas—45.2
Terminal-Bench86.189.4
DeepSWE58.773.8
GDPval-AA1743.01545.0
Finance Agent—61.4
CharXiv90.686.2
MMMU-Pro79.885.6
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$1.50
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$7.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1112

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Gemini 3.8 Flash head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 4 and Gemini 3.8 Flash leads 5 of 9 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextGemini 3.8 Flash
Overall
65.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
65.1Gemini 3.8 Flash
ACB
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
61.1Gemini 3.8 Flash
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
54.9Gemini 3.8 Flash
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
95.3Gemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench
86.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
89.4Gemini 3.8 Flash
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
73.8Gemini 3.8 Flash
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1545.0Gemini 3.8 Flash
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
86.2Gemini 3.8 Flash
MMMU-Pro
79.8Qwen3.8 Flash Next
85.6Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Workload$3.00
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Gemini 3.8 Flash comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Gemini 3.8 Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextQwen3.8 Max vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.