LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GLM-5.3-Flash: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GLM-5.3-Flash comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageGLM-5.3-Flash model page
Rank #14 vs #15AskClash overall scores 60.5 vs 60.5.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $0.15/$0.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Z.AI.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GLM-5.3-Flash benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3-Flash
Overall Score60.560.5
Leaderboard Rank#14#15
ACB66.561.2
RWT—8.5
HLE35.955.3
GPQA91.791.2
IFEval81.3—
SWE-Pro62.5—
Terminal-Bench86.184.3
DeepSWE58.763.4
GDPval-AA1743.01773.0
Finance Agent—57.9
CharXiv90.689.4
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$0.15
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$0.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published109

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs GLM-5.3-Flash head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 5 and GLM-5.3-Flash leads 3 of 8 shared benchmarks. GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3-Flash
Overall
60.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
60.5GLM-5.3-Flash
ACB
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
61.2GLM-5.3-Flash
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
55.3GLM-5.3-Flash
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
91.2GLM-5.3-Flash
Terminal-Bench
86.1Qwen3.8 Flash Next
84.3GLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
63.4GLM-5.3-Flash
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1773.0GLM-5.3-Flash
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
89.4GLM-5.3-Flash
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
GLM-5.3-Flash
Input$0.15
Output$0.50
Workload$0.25
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and GLM-5.3-Flash comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and GLM-5.3-Flash stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3-FlashGPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-6 Astra vs GLM-5.3-FlashGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM-5.3-FlashClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.