LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Hy4 Preview: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Hy4 Preview comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Flash Next model pageHy4 Preview model page
Rank #19 vs #20AskClash overall scores 57.6 vs 57.0.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $0.83/$2.50Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Tencent.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Hy4 Preview benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextHy4 Preview
Overall Score57.657.0
Leaderboard Rank#19#20
ACB66.5—
RWT—8.5
HLE35.943.4
GPQA91.792.3
IFEval81.3—
SWE-Pro62.565.7
Terminal-Bench—85.4
DeepSWE58.764.3
GDPval-AA1743.01678.0
MCP Atlas—83.7
CharXiv90.6—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$0.83
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$2.50
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published97

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Hy4 Preview head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 2 and Hy4 Preview leads 4 of 6 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextHy4 Preview
Overall
57.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
57.0Hy4 Preview
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
43.4Hy4 Preview
GPQA
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
92.3Hy4 Preview
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
65.7Hy4 Preview
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
64.3Hy4 Preview
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1678.0Hy4 Preview
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Hy4 Preview
Input$0.83
Output$2.50
Workload$1.33
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Hy4 Preview comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Hy4 Preview stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5.1 vs Hy4 PreviewClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Hy4 PreviewClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Hy4 PreviewGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3 vs Hy4 PreviewGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Hy4 Preview

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.