How do Qwen3.8 Flash Next and MiniMax-M3 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Flash Next and MiniMax-M3 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs MiniMax-M3: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Flash Next or MiniMax-M3?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Flash Next and MiniMax-M3 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs MiniMax-M3 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Flash Next model page MiniMax-M3 model page

Rank #19 vs #29AskClash overall scores 57.6 vs 43.7.

Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $0.30/$1.20Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs MiniMax.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs MiniMax-M3 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Flash Next	MiniMax-M3
Overall Score	57.6	43.7
Leaderboard Rank	#19	#29
ACB	66.5	29.8
RWT	—	8.5
HLE	35.9	37.1
GPQA	91.7	92.9
IFEval	81.3	82.9
SWE-bench	—	80.5
SWE-Pro	62.5	59.0
Terminal-Bench	—	66.0
DeepSWE	58.7	—
GDPval-AA	1743.0	58.4
OSWorld	—	70.1
MCP Atlas	—	74.2
Finance Agent	—	48.3
CharXiv	90.6	—
MMMU-Pro	—	78.1
Tau2	—	88.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.16	$0.30
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$0.47	$1.20
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	9	14

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs MiniMax-M3 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 4 and MiniMax-M3 leads 3 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextMiniMax-M3

Overall

57.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next

43.7MiniMax-M3

ACB

66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next

29.8MiniMax-M3

HLE

35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next

37.1MiniMax-M3

GPQA

91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next

92.9MiniMax-M3

IFEval

81.3Qwen3.8 Flash Next

82.9MiniMax-M3

SWE-Pro

62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next

59.0MiniMax-M3

GDPval-AA

1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next

58.4MiniMax-M3

Qwen3.8 Flash Next

Input$0.16

Output$0.47

Workload$0.25

Context1M

MiniMax-M3

Input$0.30

Output$1.20

Workload$0.54

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and MiniMax-M3 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and MiniMax-M3 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next Claude Opus 5 vs MiniMax-M3 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next Claude Fable 5 vs MiniMax-M3 GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next Grok 4.6 vs MiniMax-M3

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.