LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Muse Spark 1.1: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Rank #16 vs #20AskClash overall scores 57.9 vs 54.7.
Pricing $0.16/$0.47 vs $1.25/$4.25Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs ProprietaryAlibaba vs Meta.

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Muse Spark 1.1 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 Flash NextMuse Spark 1.1
Overall Score57.954.7
Leaderboard Rank#16#20
ACB66.551.3
RWT7.5
HLE35.962.1
GPQA91.7
IFEval81.3
SWE-Pro62.561.5
Terminal-Bench80.0
DeepSWE58.753.3
GDPval-AA1743.01381.0
OSWorld80.8
MCP Atlas88.1
Finance Agent57.2
CharXiv90.688.4
MRCR54.1
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$0.16$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$0.47$4.25
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published912

Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Muse Spark 1.1 head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 6 and Muse Spark 1.1 leads 1 of 7 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 Flash NextMuse Spark 1.1
Overall
57.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
54.7Muse Spark 1.1
ACB
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
51.3Muse Spark 1.1
HLE
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
62.1Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-Pro
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
61.5Muse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
53.3Muse Spark 1.1
GDPval-AA
1743.0Qwen3.8 Flash Next
1381.0Muse Spark 1.1
CharXiv
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
88.4Muse Spark 1.1
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M
Muse Spark 1.1
Input$1.25
Output$4.25
Workload$2.10
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Muse Spark 1.1 comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Flash Next and Muse Spark 1.1 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.