How do Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp?

AskClash compares Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Qwen3.8 Max model page DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page

Rank #7 vs #19AskClash overall scores 74.4 vs 58.2.

Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.14/$0.28Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Open Weight vs APIAlibaba vs DeepSeek.

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Qwen3.8 Max	DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Overall Score	74.4	58.2
Leaderboard Rank	#7	#19
ACB	59.0	58.6
HLE	43.6	37.0
GPQA	92.6	91.0
IFEval	82.8	—
SWE-bench	—	79.0
SWE-Pro	67.7	—
Terminal-Bench	86.6	83.9
DeepSWE	56.6	59.3
OSWorld	86.1	—
MCP Atlas	—	69.0
Finance Agent	50.6	49.5
CharXiv	88.4	—
MMMU-Pro	82.3	—
MRCR	92.9	78.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$2.00	$0.14
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$6.00	$0.28
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	12	10

Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Overall

74.4Qwen3.8 Max

58.2DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

ACB

59.0Qwen3.8 Max

58.6DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

HLE

43.6Qwen3.8 Max

37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

GPQA

92.6Qwen3.8 Max

91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Terminal-Bench

86.6Qwen3.8 Max

83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

DeepSWE

56.6Qwen3.8 Max

59.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Finance Agent

50.6Qwen3.8 Max

49.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

MRCR

92.9Qwen3.8 Max

78.7DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Qwen3.8 Max

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Input$0.14

Output$0.28

Workload$0.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max GPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.