LLM Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardQwen3.8 Max model pageQwen3.8 Flash Next model page
Rank #8 vs #19AskClash overall scores 70.2 vs 57.6.
Pricing $2.00/$6.00 vs $0.16/$0.47Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Open Weight vs Open WeightAlibaba vs Alibaba.

Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricQwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall Score70.257.6
Leaderboard Rank#8#19
ACB59.066.5
HLE43.635.9
GPQA92.691.7
IFEval82.881.3
SWE-Pro67.762.5
Terminal-Bench86.6—
DeepSWE56.658.7
GDPval-AA—1743.0
OSWorld86.1—
Finance Agent50.6—
CharXiv88.490.6
MMMU-Pro82.3—
MRCR92.9—
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.16
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$6.00$0.47
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published139

Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next head-to-head charts

Qwen3.8 Max leads 5 and Qwen3.8 Flash Next leads 3 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Flash Next is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Qwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Flash Next
Overall
70.2Qwen3.8 Max
57.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
ACB
59.0Qwen3.8 Max
66.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
HLE
43.6Qwen3.8 Max
35.9Qwen3.8 Flash Next
GPQA
92.6Qwen3.8 Max
91.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
IFEval
82.8Qwen3.8 Max
81.3Qwen3.8 Flash Next
SWE-Pro
67.7Qwen3.8 Max
62.5Qwen3.8 Flash Next
DeepSWE
56.6Qwen3.8 Max
58.7Qwen3.8 Flash Next
CharXiv
88.4Qwen3.8 Max
90.6Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Qwen3.8 Max
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M
Qwen3.8 Flash Next
Input$0.16
Output$0.47
Workload$0.25
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Flash Next comparisons

Explore how Qwen3.8 Max and Qwen3.8 Flash Next stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 MaxClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 MaxGLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 MaxGrok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.