LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5.1 model pageDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp model page
Rank #1 vs #22AskClash overall scores 92.0 vs 50.1.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $0.14/$0.28Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs APIAnthropic vs DeepSeek.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Overall Score92.050.1
Leaderboard Rank#1#22
ACB79.258.6
RWT9.0—
HLE65.037.0
GPQA93.791.0
SWE-bench—79.0
SWE-Pro81.2—
Terminal-Bench91.483.9
DeepSWE67.459.3
GDPval-AA1853.0—
MCP Atlas—69.0
Finance Agent58.949.5
MMMU-Pro90.6—
ARC-AGI 290.0—
MRCR—78.7
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$0.14
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$0.28
Context Window1M1M
Benchmarks Published1110

Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 0 of 7 shared benchmarks. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Overall
92.0Claude Fable 5.1
50.1DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
ACB
79.2Claude Fable 5.1
58.6DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
HLE
65.0Claude Fable 5.1
37.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
GPQA
93.7Claude Fable 5.1
91.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Terminal-Bench
91.4Claude Fable 5.1
83.9DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
DeepSWE
67.4Claude Fable 5.1
59.3DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Finance Agent
58.9Claude Fable 5.1
49.5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Claude Fable 5.1
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Input$0.14
Output$0.28
Workload$0.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5Claude Opus 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpClaude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpClaude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3GLM-5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpClaude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6Grok 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpClaude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.