How do Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 compare on coding benchmarks?

The comparison table shows SWE-bench, SWE-Pro, SWE-Atlas, Terminal-Bench, DeepSWE, and coding agent index scores for both Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 when publicly disclosed.

LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Q: Which is better: Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

AskClash compares Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 side by side across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, AskClash ACB, and context window so you can see which model wins on each benchmark.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboard Claude Fable 5.1 model page Qwen3.8 Max 0902 model page

Rank #1 vs #9AskClash overall scores 91.4 vs 70.0.

Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.

Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

Metric	Claude Fable 5.1	Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score	91.4	70.0
Leaderboard Rank	#1	#9
ACB	79.2	59.0
RWT	9.0	—
HLE	65.0	43.6
GPQA	93.7	92.6
IFEval	—	82.8
SWE-Pro	81.2	67.7
SWE-Atlas	—	66.3
Terminal-Bench	91.4	86.6
DeepSWE	67.4	69.3
GDPval-AA	1853.0	—
OSWorld	—	86.1
Finance Agent	58.9	—
CharXiv	—	88.4
MMMU-Pro	90.6	82.7
ARC-AGI 2	90.0	—
MRCR	—	92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)	$10.0	$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)	$50.0	$6.00
Context Window	1M	1M
Benchmarks Published	11	12

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5.1 leads 7 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 1 of 8 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Overall

91.4Claude Fable 5.1

70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

ACB

79.2Claude Fable 5.1

59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902

HLE

65.0Claude Fable 5.1

43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

GPQA

93.7Claude Fable 5.1

92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

SWE-Pro

81.2Claude Fable 5.1

67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Terminal-Bench

91.4Claude Fable 5.1

86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902

DeepSWE

67.4Claude Fable 5.1

69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902

MMMU-Pro

90.6Claude Fable 5.1

82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Claude Fable 5.1

Input$10.0

Output$50.0

Workload$20

Context1M

Qwen3.8 Max 0902

Input$2.00

Output$6.00

Workload$3.20

Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM-5.3 GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.