LLM Comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: benchmark scores, pricing & comparison.

Side-by-side Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparison across SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, coding agent scores, token pricing, context window, and AskClash RWT. Green marks the winner on each benchmark.

Open live leaderboardClaude Fable 5 model pageQwen3.8 Max 0902 model page
Rank #3 vs #9AskClash overall scores 81.5 vs 70.0.
Pricing $10.0/$50.0 vs $2.00/$6.00Input and output token prices per 1M tokens when published.
Proprietary vs ProprietaryAnthropic vs Alibaba.

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 benchmark comparison

Green cells highlight the winning model for each metric. Scores are cached from the AskClash LLM leaderboard snapshot.

MetricClaude Fable 5Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall Score81.570.0
Leaderboard Rank#3#9
ACB64.659.0
RWT9.0—
Coding Agent Index77.2—
HLE64.543.6
GPQA94.592.6
IFEval80.382.8
SWE-bench95.5—
SWE-Pro80.367.7
SWE-Atlas83.366.3
Terminal-Bench88.086.6
DeepSWE69.769.3
GDPval-AA1932.5—
OSWorld85.086.1
Finance Agent56.3—
CharXiv93.588.4
MMMU-Pro92.782.7
Tau289.2—
MRCR—92.9
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$10.0$2.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$50.0$6.00
Context Window1M+1M
Benchmarks Published1712

Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 head-to-head charts

Claude Fable 5 leads 10 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads 2 of 12 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is cheaper on a defined 1M-input / 200K-output workload. Charts show only benchmarks both models publish.

Claude Fable 5Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Overall
81.5Claude Fable 5
70.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
ACB
64.6Claude Fable 5
59.0Qwen3.8 Max 0902
HLE
64.5Claude Fable 5
43.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
GPQA
94.5Claude Fable 5
92.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
IFEval
80.3Claude Fable 5
82.8Qwen3.8 Max 0902
SWE-Pro
80.3Claude Fable 5
67.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
SWE-Atlas
83.3Claude Fable 5
66.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Terminal-Bench
88.0Claude Fable 5
86.6Qwen3.8 Max 0902
DeepSWE
69.7Claude Fable 5
69.3Qwen3.8 Max 0902
OSWorld
85.0Claude Fable 5
86.1Qwen3.8 Max 0902
CharXiv
93.5Claude Fable 5
88.4Qwen3.8 Max 0902
MMMU-Pro
92.7Claude Fable 5
82.7Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Claude Fable 5
Input$10.0
Output$50.0
Workload$20
Context1M+
Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Input$2.00
Output$6.00
Workload$3.20
Context1M

Workload = published cost of 1M input + 200K output tokens. Open the live leaderboard for interactive compare charts.

More Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comparisons

Explore how Claude Fable 5 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 stack up against other top-ranked LLMs.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs GLM-5.3GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.6Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 SolGPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902

How to read this comparison

Benchmark scores

Higher is better for all benchmark scores (SWE-bench, GPQA, HLE, Terminal-Bench, etc.). Green marks the model with the higher score.

Token pricing

Lower is better for input and output prices. Green marks the cheaper model per 1M tokens.

Coverage matters

Models with fewer disclosed benchmark cells may have inflated percentile scores. Check the benchmark cell count for context.

This comparison page is generated from the AskClash LLM leaderboard cache. Open the live leaderboard for real-time scores and interactive filtering.